Connelly on Commerce

Terry Connelly is dean emeritus of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

With Obama’s Stimulus 2.0 speech and the Dirty Dozen debt cut deliberations due to take center stage next month in Washington, it is clear that the heaviest lobbying artillery is being positioned and rolled out on the political talk shows and cable TV money coverage.

Bored as the media folks  are now becoming the second coming of the recession-to-be   hyping the short-sellers gloom-and -doom propaganda with their coverage of every chicken little economist, they seem to be shifting attention to the coming fight over “repatriation” of the $1-2 trillion dollars in offshore profits of US multinationals “trapped” overseas by the very tax loophole the same corporations lobbied for themselves — the one that lets them escape US corporate tax (at the relatively high rate of 35% compared with other capitalist nations, few of whom tax offshore earnings at all, but reduced by overseas taxes paid).

US multinations with substantial offshore profits are pushing hard for a tax holiday to bring those funds back to the US at little or no tax liability in order to put them to work in the US economy — allegedly to promote domestic job growth, although the last time this happened the proceeds were used largely to fund dividends, executive salaries, stock buybacks and M&A (which is usually a job killer. Despite that fact, there are good arguments, particularly in terms of the international competitiveness of US exporters, in favor of a repatriation tax holiday, and some even hope the President  will include a nod to such proposals in his coming speech as an olive branch , if not to the tea Party, at least to his natural constituency among liberal Silicon Valley CEO”s, even if it offends the Huffington Post crowd and certain liberal New York Times columnists, who will accuse him of (again) giving in to extortion by the moneyed interests.

So the lobbyists rounded up all the usual pro-business suspects and even had John McCain on TV pumping the repatriation case, which has a certain symmetry  given his previous liberal views on the matter of letting illegal immigrants remain “patriated” in the US after paying a small fine. None dare call a “Tax holiday” amnesty! But what took the cake was the pro golfer Phil Mickelson appearing on CNBC to report the latest buzz from the corporate sponsors in the locker room at his most recent tournament as being all about the crying need for the repatriation tax break, which of course he endorsed with all the fervor he brings to his patented chip shots.

But one thing about pro-golfers — they wear their corporate sponsorship on their sleeve, quite literally, and on their hats, shirts, clubhead covers,  golf balls, shoes, gloves and ball markers — this at least creates complete transparency of who is funding their presence on the course. What is we mandated a similar system for our politicians as they engage in the great autumn debate about how to get control of the deficit in the famous ‘long run” while they consider a Stimulus 2.0 for the “short run’ to prevent the Recession 2.0 that CNBC has told us is coming like Christmas.

So Senator Dick Shelby could wear the JP Morgan hat while he argues for repeal of Dodd/Frank as part of the bargain; Tom Coburn could were the Hospital Corporation of America polo shirt while he argues for more Medicaid cuts; Bob Corker would have  Toyota driving glove in full view while he argues to pull the plug on the GM bailout or the Chamber of Commerce pullover while he argues to cut the employment mandate from the Federal Reserve charter; McCain, of course, would have the Cisco shoes in full view while he pushes the offshore earning tax holiday. And it goes for the other side too, as Nancy Pelosi dons the AARP windbreaker for her fight to thwart any momentum for Social Security cost-of-living formula changes, and Harry Reid can wear a Nevada regional airlines logo on his sleeve as he battles to keep the rural airport ticket subsidy.

We would all be better off if we could see right on the TV screen, just like we see on the final eighteen hole showdowns on Sunday, just what corporate and other institutional  interests are keeping our Congressional representatives “in the game”. And then maybe when Howard Schultz of Starbucks suggests that they all get together and pull their sponsorships in an effort to force bi-partisan agreement for a change, we can really see it happen real-time. Sure made a difference when it happened to Tiger!

Filed under: Uncategorized

Terry Connelly is dean emeritus of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

Ben Bernanke is at heart an academic; and like a good dean who knows he must lead a divided faculty, he did not get out front of his colleagues in his Jackson Hole speeach this morning. But while he did not announce any specifics as to any form of potential QE3 to help the sputtering economy, he did not take it off the table, either. Indeed, he even opened the door a bit by extending the time of the upcoming September Fed meeting to two days from one — this is a dean who knows his faculty needs a good debate as the data comes in during the next three weeks. So these are the salient points:

1) Bernanke was NOT intimidated by Rick Perry’s “treason” charge against QE3 into taking any forms of “money printing” off the table, although some like Paul Krugman in todays New York Times, have suggested that. They are mis-reading “dean” Bernake’s deferecne to his colleagues need to debate, but his is not foregoing his rrole to DECIDE.

2) Bernanke is not panicked into thinking we are headed into a recession “double-dip” — the fear in the market exceeds the reality of the data, and Bernanke knows this and is trying to calm the waters a bit away from the hysterical commentators on CNBC and Bloomberg: it seems that cable networks’ rush to cover “Armageddon: you heard it here first” creates an atmosphere where every Chicken Little suddenly turns pro.

3) The real problem of economic sustainability remains Europe, which in the end makes US stocks a good investment — yet we over-blow that too as we in America simply don’t appreciate how the European political system “works” — at times the unwieldy emergent structure of the European community makes the US look positively functional!

4) In this light, Trichet’s speech to the Jakcoson Hole conference this weekend will be the important speech: will he foretell a pause at least in the European Central Bank’s mindless headlong rush to raise interest rates — hopefully yes.

5) Bernanke didn’t kick the can but more accurately passed the ball to Congress to act on some forms of fiscal and jobs stimulus ASAP, while maintaining a long-term plan to seriously reduce the projected deficit. This is a benefit to Obama and a rejection of the Tea Party agenda. Tis makes extension of payroll tax holiday a little more probable.

5) The market reaction, especially in the face of the oncoming hurricane, suggests that some traders at least are beginning to consider the “unthinkable” –namely, that Bernanke may have it right.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Terry Connelly is dean emeritus of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

1) The trade Monday AM will probably be “risk off” at first (which means stock market down big) until it is clear how the longer-dated Treasury market is acting — ie, does it confirm rampant  fear in the market of higher US interest rates because of the downgrade at precisely the wrong time in our fragile “recovery’. It would help if the European Central Bank begins buying italian and Spanish government bonds directly by US opening. Some hope for a counterintuitive stable open because the notion of a downgrade was already in the rumor market during the day Friday.

2) There has never been a US Federal Reserve Meeting with the US long term debt rated less than AAA by any agency; will they take note? Will they directly address the risk to long-term interest rates by at least indicating they are considering adjusting the maturity of their balance sheet treasury holdings to longer-dated paper (a form of “QE III”? Will they announce any other form of modified easing like extending the period they will hold their current balance sheet to the same “extended period’ they have foretold for low short term rates? Any of these moves would tend to stabilize the markets for the moment.

3) Congress is out of town so can do no harm this week, but we will possibly get the first announced appointment to the “Super Congress’ now charged with dealing with the deficit in a way that will appease S&P– three from each party in the House and Senate, appointed by the respective party leaders. Soon to be known as the “Dirty Dozen”. It will need at least one Profile in Courage to elicit a 7-5 vote for something like a $4 trillion deal. The market will pay attention to these appointments to scope the odds on a real deal.

4) The markets will recognize in due course that the Italian problem in paying its debts (third largest borrowing country in the world, behind only US and Japan) is worse than any risk with the US.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Terry Connelly is dean emeritus of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

Most people in the US according to the latest polling do not support raising the ‘debt ceiling” and accordingly are willing to live with a US default on its “full faith and credit” obligations, which of course includes not just our interest payments to foreign and deomestic bondholders but also Social Security checks,  Veterans benefits, tax refunds and other obligations of the US Treasury — over 80 million separate checks per month.

But wait a minute, you say — I didn’t mean the Government should stop paying what it owes ME! And I hold Treasury bonds in my IRA, my folks get Social security, my cousin is a disabled Vet, and my wife has a tax refund due.

But it gets worse: far worse, and only the new class of political demagogues and their co-dependents in cable media, coupled with the failure of mainstream media to really investigate and spell out what easily predictable consequences of default would be,  stand between you and a cold shower of reality of what a failure to reach a deal on raising the debt ceiling will mean. Let’s take that showe, step by step:

1) Senior Congressional leadership and the President either fail to reach a deal by July 22, or discussions break down: then all three bond rating agencies will put the US on credit watch with a warning of imminent downgrade to ‘default” status.

2) The bond markets will finally react very adversely to the prospect of default and interest rates on all manner and maturity of debt instruments will spkie sharply, and the stock market will fall 500 pints or ore in one day.

3) The negotiators re-convene and try to push a shorter-term deal through the Congress before August 2but fail in the House of Representatives (as they did initially with TARP — again because the public didn’t understand what it meant to them): the bond and stock markets only get worse, as the rating agencies give some form of final warning.

4) August 2 comes and goes with no deal; the Treasury triages its outflows, continuing to pay interest on outstanding bonds and notes and bills, but cannot undertake new borrowings  to roll over principle due, and necessarily defaults on Social Security or other  payments due to US citizens; despite the continued debt service payments, the rating agencies, noting the intransigence of Congress and cancellation of refundings,  quickly downgrade the ratings on all US Treasury obligations as low as  ”D” — lower than junk.

5) Overnight, the banking system around the world freezes up even worse than in the Lehman debacle, because all overnight lending between them (the so-called “repo” market), which is the grease for the global wheel of routine banking transactions, grinds to a halt with universal uncertainty about the balance sheets of every holder of Treasuries.

6) Commerce as we know it ceases because all payments are frozen. Money market fund values will fall precipitously; the Treasury  security holding of most US banks, insurance companies  and pension funds will become practically worthless, because they will no longer be authorized to carry them in their “AAA” basket, and yet they will be unable to dispose of them even in a “fire sale” because the logical buyers will be in the same situation(not to mention the US Federal Reserve, the usual buyer of last resort). Congress would neeed to act immediately to authorize the Fed to hold the “D” rated securities if only to save ALL financial institutions, and the world’s other Central Banks would have to obtain similar authority.

7) You won’t be able to withdraw your funds from the bank because they will all close, and the FDIC will be in no position to make good on its guarnatees to the extent that it too, holds US Treasuries.

8) Global stock and bond markets will crash by thousands of points — and the bond markets will go through an equivalent collapse.

9) The price of all commodities except gold will collapse: gold will double each day (Moore’s Law 2.0), as trading gold will be the “only game in town” as Goldman Sachs partners again revert to bartering their personal gold bar caches literally on Wall street sidewalks.

10) The President will be forced to declare a national emergency and the Congress will vote again to finally approve a debt ceiling increase now that the recalcitrant  ”Tea Party” Republicans can justify their vote in favor by claiming that “the markets made us do it” — but it will be too late to avert a global Depression.

How’s that for starters? Will somebody please show where I am wrong?

Recalling, roughly,  the immortal words of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid when they faced a “dive of the cliff together” moment  with the law on their tails: BUTCH: “We’ve go to jump”. SUNDANCE: “But I can’t swim”. BUTCH: “Don’t worry, the fall will probably kill ya.” In our case, it’s not just the default, it’s the downgrade that will kill us.”

Filed under: Uncategorized

Bring on the downgrade! That’s what some in Washington seem to be cheering for these days — maybe enough of them to stop a vote in the House of representatives to raise the debt ceiling before the roof falls in on August 2. It’s time to get serious about this.

The credit rating agencies have made it abundantly clear that, without progress on the debt ceiling budget talks by the middle of this month, they will put the US on credit watch for a likely downgrade of the Americans Triple A credit rating. In the case of Standard & Poors, for example, that will be all the way down to “D” — for “default” — lower than junk. Now the markets may or may not react in mid-July to the rating agencies “final warning’  – Wall Street professionals cannot believe that the politicians in Washington will actually let the US go in to default onits obligations. They rightly view as sheer nonsense the idea of some that we can simply pay the interest on our credit card and let things like military pay or Social security checks fall by the wayside for a while — those latter events would be events of default, too, in the eyes of the rating agencies. They know on Wall Street all too well what the actual consequences of a “D’ rating would be. But Wall Street has lost credibility with the American voter, and too many of them have been led to believe by somem politicians and cable commentators  that a credit dwongrade or even “temporary’ default can be managed to a good outcome

Some want this downgrade to happen because they think this would seal  Obama’s doom in 2012 as the only President ever to ‘lose’ the Triple A rating or to bring on a shutdown of the government to the point where we stopped paying our Social security checks. But that’s not the half of what would happen. With a “D” rating, virtually the preponderance of the balance sheets of banks, insurance companies, pension funds and even the Us Federal reserve would become worthless overnight; the “freeze-up” of transactions among financial institutions and in commerce generally would make the Lehman event seem like a spring thaw — no bank could trust any other overnight because they would all be capital-impaired, with no market to which to sell their worthless US Treasury securities, because no other financial institution would be able to classify them as capital. There would meanwhile be a run on every bank by depositors, bankrupting the FDIC in short order, as ordinary individuals scrambled for any ounce of cash.

These are not “scare tactics”; we’ve seen the trailer to this movie before in the days after Lehman’s bankruptcy filing — but this time, it won’t just be AIG that goes under — who would rescue the Fed?  Every balance sheet stuffed with ‘safe’ US securities would be technically worthless — not because American can’t afford to pay its obligations — we are, for the moment, still a multi-trillion dollar economy — but because one particularly willful but  stupid clique of politicians believe that they need the downgrade and  default event, and the expectable stock and bond market crashes, as their excuse to vote eventually for the debt ceiling increasde AFTER the damage is done to Obama and because, as they will ex[lain to their Tea Party  "base',  "the market [which they worship] made them do it”.

It is high time for the media generally to do its homework and alert the public to what happens if this scenario comes to pass and  expose those who are shamelessly exploiting public ignorance for short-term political advantage. Although as usual it is the Tea Party denizens and Fox News that are peddling the idiocy of default as a good idea, some on both the Right and the Left are guilty as charges on this count as well, as they argue that their leaders should draw ‘lines in the sand” in the debt ceiling debate to [prevent any compromise or short-term agreement that would violate their budget principles. Lines in the sand, however,  only work in the kids’ sandbox — on a real beach, they tend to get wipes out by powerful tides.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Terry Connelly is dean of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

Is there such a thing as “too small to fail”?  Greece’s debt — if rescued again by the ECB-led bailout 2.0 — will be larger by far than its entire economic output. But that debt is held by the largest Eurozone banks and by the ECB itself, so if Greece goes down, so do they, and there is no European form of the infamous US TARP program that bailed out our banking giants when they went long and wrong on housing derivatives and credit default swaps.

But there are those in Europe and on American cable TV– like the ideological “reporter” Rick Santelli on CNBC, who are arguing that Greece should be allowed — indeed, forced –to fail and their investors along with it  in order to avoid the mother of all moral hazards. Recall that the same folks were actively pressuring Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke to let Lehman go under as a lesson to others, after the bad taste left by the Fed’s engineered bailout of Bear Stearns (although of course the Bear shareholders lost their fortunes).

Readers of this Blog can look up our comments  at the time that letting Lehman fail would prove a lot more expensive to the US taxpayer than a bailout  – a view that proved to be overwhelmingly correct. We need to keep in mind the same lesson with respect to Greece, even though “kicking the can down the road” obviously leaves a bad taste. The fact is that the European banking sector is not yet healthy enough to handle a Greek default and it will take a couple more years — at least until 2013 — for them to recover enough from the housing/financial meltdown of 2008. If the European authorities listen to the braying of cable TV commentators and German politicians, in a way similar to the cowering by Paulson and Bernanke to Rick Santelli et al in the US in the case of Lehman, we will have a Lehman 2.0 in the form of Greece, and the European Central Bank may even turn out to be AIG: ironically, forcing the Germans to bail out their own Frankenstein for a change,

Filed under: Uncategorized

Terry Connelly is dean of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

June may be a time for drag racing on the back roads of teenage America, but it’s no time for a game of chicken in Washington DC regarding the full faith and credit of US debt obligations.

Credit rating agencies, fresh from dtheir spinal implants after their disastrous breakdown enabling the housing and Wall Street financial crisis are itching to be the first to put America’s triple A rating on notice of downgrade — a move that would shake the bond markets out of their complacency, make the Euro/Greek crisis look tame by comparison and put the chances of another one-day 700 point type drop in the Dow Jones Average  at at least 50-50. You will recall that such a 700-point drop is what finally “convinced” Congress to approve the bitter medicine of TARP prescribed by the US Treasury for the financial mess the banking world was in. That Dow drop enabled most Republican and some on conservative Democrat opponents of TARP to hide under the barrel of saving individual investors from a market crash, rather than saving the bankers, when they relectantly voted for TARP. Is another such scenario unfolding in the nation’s capital now about the debt ceiling.

While common sense suggests we should not be playing with fire with the debt ceiling  (which creates the specter of US credit default, or at least an alternative cessation of government programs like Social security payments, Pell Grants, pay checks for the military and domestic defense contractors, etc), it may be the case that some in Congress we need to actually bring on such a financial Armagedddon —  reflected in a stock market/bond market combined crash — to justify their eventual vote to lift the debt ceiling and thus again “save” investors from the debacle that the Congress itself brought on!

If that is truly the case,  get into cash (and maybe some dividend payers and quick! With the media cheering for a train wreck (far more interesting and newsworthy than a timely settlement of the issue), we can be sure that the scenario just outlined will soon sweep Greece off the front financial pages, and trigger the markets’ usual “discounting mechanism”

Filed under: Uncategorized