Connelly on Commerce

Icon

Ageno School of Business dean Terry Connelly on business, the economy, and more. . .

Fed Confirms the “New Normal”

The markets are digesting the Federal Reserve’s post-meeting comments today. We now see dissent at the Fed — usually a bulwark of unanimity — virtually mirroring the conflict in the US Congress. Does the fed have its own version of the Tea Party now? Severe policy divisions at the Fed must be disconcerting to investors, particularly equity investors. Bond investors on the short end have made a small fortune as rates have dropped precipitously with the Fed’s new two-year “put” (the cap on short rates), well trough the next election and Chairman Bernanke’s term).  The Fed’s majority has clearly passed the “stimulus” ball back to Congress and the Administration except for the internally-contested interest rate cap. Yet this hyper-extedned low-rate commitment seems to also suggest that the Fed believes there will be a “grand bargain” by the end of the year on US debt and wants to push against the resultant fiscal drag on the economy. All in all, it’s a confirmation of a low-growth (BUT NON-Recessionary) “new normal” for the economy.

Filed under: Uncategorized,

“What’s Next”

Terry Connelly is dean emeritus of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

1) The trade Monday AM will probably be “risk off” at first (which means stock market down big) until it is clear how the longer-dated Treasury market is acting — ie, does it confirm rampant  fear in the market of higher US interest rates because of the downgrade at precisely the wrong time in our fragile “recovery’. It would help if the European Central Bank begins buying italian and Spanish government bonds directly by US opening. Some hope for a counterintuitive stable open because the notion of a downgrade was already in the rumor market during the day Friday.

2) There has never been a US Federal Reserve Meeting with the US long term debt rated less than AAA by any agency; will they take note? Will they directly address the risk to long-term interest rates by at least indicating they are considering adjusting the maturity of their balance sheet treasury holdings to longer-dated paper (a form of “QE III”? Will they announce any other form of modified easing like extending the period they will hold their current balance sheet to the same “extended period’ they have foretold for low short term rates? Any of these moves would tend to stabilize the markets for the moment.

3) Congress is out of town so can do no harm this week, but we will possibly get the first announced appointment to the “Super Congress’ now charged with dealing with the deficit in a way that will appease S&P– three from each party in the House and Senate, appointed by the respective party leaders. Soon to be known as the “Dirty Dozen”. It will need at least one Profile in Courage to elicit a 7-5 vote for something like a $4 trillion deal. The market will pay attention to these appointments to scope the odds on a real deal.

4) The markets will recognize in due course that the Italian problem in paying its debts (third largest borrowing country in the world, behind only US and Japan) is worse than any risk with the US.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Why They Must Deal on Debt

Terry Connelly is dean emeritus of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

It is clear that the House GOP contains a sizable faction that will not vote “Aye” on any debt ceiling lift, even Boehner’s bill, their own Speaker. It is also apparent that republican votes would be needed to avoid a filibuster by somebody or other (DeMint?) on Reid’s bill. Therefore, no bill can pass either house without votes from both parties. the only question that remains is will they be able to do it before a market crash, or, like in TARP, only after the market meltdown “proves” that they have to do it. There was no  Tea Party in 2008, so best guess is that the markets probably will have to force the issue this time, too: unless Boehner gives in on a one-step process, and then the House will pass a bill with plenty of Democratic votes and the Tea Party bloc will be marginalized.

Filed under: Uncategorized,

What would a US default mean to you?

Terry Connelly is dean emeritus of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

Most people in the US according to the latest polling do not support raising the ‘debt ceiling” and accordingly are willing to live with a US default on its “full faith and credit” obligations, which of course includes not just our interest payments to foreign and deomestic bondholders but also Social Security checks,  Veterans benefits, tax refunds and other obligations of the US Treasury — over 80 million separate checks per month.

But wait a minute, you say — I didn’t mean the Government should stop paying what it owes ME! And I hold Treasury bonds in my IRA, my folks get Social security, my cousin is a disabled Vet, and my wife has a tax refund due.

But it gets worse: far worse, and only the new class of political demagogues and their co-dependents in cable media, coupled with the failure of mainstream media to really investigate and spell out what easily predictable consequences of default would be,  stand between you and a cold shower of reality of what a failure to reach a deal on raising the debt ceiling will mean. Let’s take that showe, step by step:

1) Senior Congressional leadership and the President either fail to reach a deal by July 22, or discussions break down: then all three bond rating agencies will put the US on credit watch with a warning of imminent downgrade to ‘default” status.

2) The bond markets will finally react very adversely to the prospect of default and interest rates on all manner and maturity of debt instruments will spkie sharply, and the stock market will fall 500 pints or ore in one day.

3) The negotiators re-convene and try to push a shorter-term deal through the Congress before August 2but fail in the House of Representatives (as they did initially with TARP — again because the public didn’t understand what it meant to them): the bond and stock markets only get worse, as the rating agencies give some form of final warning.

4) August 2 comes and goes with no deal; the Treasury triages its outflows, continuing to pay interest on outstanding bonds and notes and bills, but cannot undertake new borrowings  to roll over principle due, and necessarily defaults on Social Security or other  payments due to US citizens; despite the continued debt service payments, the rating agencies, noting the intransigence of Congress and cancellation of refundings,  quickly downgrade the ratings on all US Treasury obligations as low as  ”D” — lower than junk.

5) Overnight, the banking system around the world freezes up even worse than in the Lehman debacle, because all overnight lending between them (the so-called “repo” market), which is the grease for the global wheel of routine banking transactions, grinds to a halt with universal uncertainty about the balance sheets of every holder of Treasuries.

6) Commerce as we know it ceases because all payments are frozen. Money market fund values will fall precipitously; the Treasury  security holding of most US banks, insurance companies  and pension funds will become practically worthless, because they will no longer be authorized to carry them in their “AAA” basket, and yet they will be unable to dispose of them even in a “fire sale” because the logical buyers will be in the same situation(not to mention the US Federal Reserve, the usual buyer of last resort). Congress would neeed to act immediately to authorize the Fed to hold the “D” rated securities if only to save ALL financial institutions, and the world’s other Central Banks would have to obtain similar authority.

7) You won’t be able to withdraw your funds from the bank because they will all close, and the FDIC will be in no position to make good on its guarnatees to the extent that it too, holds US Treasuries.

8) Global stock and bond markets will crash by thousands of points — and the bond markets will go through an equivalent collapse.

9) The price of all commodities except gold will collapse: gold will double each day (Moore’s Law 2.0), as trading gold will be the “only game in town” as Goldman Sachs partners again revert to bartering their personal gold bar caches literally on Wall street sidewalks.

10) The President will be forced to declare a national emergency and the Congress will vote again to finally approve a debt ceiling increase now that the recalcitrant  ”Tea Party” Republicans can justify their vote in favor by claiming that “the markets made us do it” — but it will be too late to avert a global Depression.

How’s that for starters? Will somebody please show where I am wrong?

Recalling, roughly,  the immortal words of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid when they faced a “dive of the cliff together” moment  with the law on their tails: BUTCH: “We’ve go to jump”. SUNDANCE: “But I can’t swim”. BUTCH: “Don’t worry, the fall will probably kill ya.” In our case, it’s not just the default, it’s the downgrade that will kill us.”

 

 

 

Filed under: Uncategorized

Subprime Treasury Bonds? Do Some Want A Downgrade of the US?

Bring on the downgrade! That’s what some in Washington seem to be cheering for these days — maybe enough of them to stop a vote in the House of representatives to raise the debt ceiling before the roof falls in on August 2. It’s time to get serious about this.

The credit rating agencies have made it abundantly clear that, without progress on the debt ceiling budget talks by the middle of this month, they will put the US on credit watch for a likely downgrade of the Americans Triple A credit rating. In the case of Standard & Poors, for example, that will be all the way down to “D” — for “default” — lower than junk. Now the markets may or may not react in mid-July to the rating agencies “final warning’  – Wall Street professionals cannot believe that the politicians in Washington will actually let the US go in to default onits obligations. They rightly view as sheer nonsense the idea of some that we can simply pay the interest on our credit card and let things like military pay or Social security checks fall by the wayside for a while — those latter events would be events of default, too, in the eyes of the rating agencies. They know on Wall Street all too well what the actual consequences of a “D’ rating would be. But Wall Street has lost credibility with the American voter, and too many of them have been led to believe by somem politicians and cable commentators  that a credit dwongrade or even “temporary’ default can be managed to a good outcome

Some want this downgrade to happen because they think this would seal  Obama’s doom in 2012 as the only President ever to ‘lose’ the Triple A rating or to bring on a shutdown of the government to the point where we stopped paying our Social security checks. But that’s not the half of what would happen. With a “D” rating, virtually the preponderance of the balance sheets of banks, insurance companies, pension funds and even the Us Federal reserve would become worthless overnight; the “freeze-up” of transactions among financial institutions and in commerce generally would make the Lehman event seem like a spring thaw — no bank could trust any other overnight because they would all be capital-impaired, with no market to which to sell their worthless US Treasury securities, because no other financial institution would be able to classify them as capital. There would meanwhile be a run on every bank by depositors, bankrupting the FDIC in short order, as ordinary individuals scrambled for any ounce of cash.

These are not “scare tactics”; we’ve seen the trailer to this movie before in the days after Lehman’s bankruptcy filing — but this time, it won’t just be AIG that goes under — who would rescue the Fed?  Every balance sheet stuffed with ‘safe’ US securities would be technically worthless — not because American can’t afford to pay its obligations — we are, for the moment, still a multi-trillion dollar economy — but because one particularly willful but  stupid clique of politicians believe that they need the downgrade and  default event, and the expectable stock and bond market crashes, as their excuse to vote eventually for the debt ceiling increasde AFTER the damage is done to Obama and because, as they will ex[lain to their Tea Party  "base',  "the market [which they worship] made them do it”.

It is high time for the media generally to do its homework and alert the public to what happens if this scenario comes to pass and  expose those who are shamelessly exploiting public ignorance for short-term political advantage. Although as usual it is the Tea Party denizens and Fox News that are peddling the idiocy of default as a good idea, some on both the Right and the Left are guilty as charges on this count as well, as they argue that their leaders should draw ‘lines in the sand” in the debt ceiling debate to [prevent any compromise or short-term agreement that would violate their budget principles. Lines in the sand, however,  only work in the kids’ sandbox — on a real beach, they tend to get wipes out by powerful tides.

 

Filed under: Uncategorized

“Greece might equal Lehman”

Terry Connelly is dean of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

Is there such a thing as “too small to fail”?  Greece’s debt — if rescued again by the ECB-led bailout 2.0 — will be larger by far than its entire economic output. But that debt is held by the largest Eurozone banks and by the ECB itself, so if Greece goes down, so do they, and there is no European form of the infamous US TARP program that bailed out our banking giants when they went long and wrong on housing derivatives and credit default swaps.

But there are those in Europe and on American cable TV– like the ideological “reporter” Rick Santelli on CNBC, who are arguing that Greece should be allowed — indeed, forced –to fail and their investors along with it  in order to avoid the mother of all moral hazards. Recall that the same folks were actively pressuring Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke to let Lehman go under as a lesson to others, after the bad taste left by the Fed’s engineered bailout of Bear Stearns (although of course the Bear shareholders lost their fortunes).

Readers of this Blog can look up our comments  at the time that letting Lehman fail would prove a lot more expensive to the US taxpayer than a bailout  – a view that proved to be overwhelmingly correct. We need to keep in mind the same lesson with respect to Greece, even though “kicking the can down the road” obviously leaves a bad taste. The fact is that the European banking sector is not yet healthy enough to handle a Greek default and it will take a couple more years — at least until 2013 — for them to recover enough from the housing/financial meltdown of 2008. If the European authorities listen to the braying of cable TV commentators and German politicians, in a way similar to the cowering by Paulson and Bernanke to Rick Santelli et al in the US in the case of Lehman, we will have a Lehman 2.0 in the form of Greece, and the European Central Bank may even turn out to be AIG: ironically, forcing the Germans to bail out their own Frankenstein for a change,

 

 

 

Filed under: Uncategorized

Playing with Fire

Terry Connelly is dean of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

 

June may be a time for drag racing on the back roads of teenage America, but it’s no time for a game of chicken in Washington DC regarding the full faith and credit of US debt obligations.

Credit rating agencies, fresh from dtheir spinal implants after their disastrous breakdown enabling the housing and Wall Street financial crisis are itching to be the first to put America’s triple A rating on notice of downgrade — a move that would shake the bond markets out of their complacency, make the Euro/Greek crisis look tame by comparison and put the chances of another one-day 700 point type drop in the Dow Jones Average  at at least 50-50. You will recall that such a 700-point drop is what finally “convinced” Congress to approve the bitter medicine of TARP prescribed by the US Treasury for the financial mess the banking world was in. That Dow drop enabled most Republican and some on conservative Democrat opponents of TARP to hide under the barrel of saving individual investors from a market crash, rather than saving the bankers, when they relectantly voted for TARP. Is another such scenario unfolding in the nation’s capital now about the debt ceiling.

While common sense suggests we should not be playing with fire with the debt ceiling  (which creates the specter of US credit default, or at least an alternative cessation of government programs like Social security payments, Pell Grants, pay checks for the military and domestic defense contractors, etc), it may be the case that some in Congress we need to actually bring on such a financial Armagedddon —  reflected in a stock market/bond market combined crash — to justify their eventual vote to lift the debt ceiling and thus again “save” investors from the debacle that the Congress itself brought on!

If that is truly the case,  get into cash (and maybe some dividend payers and quick! With the media cheering for a train wreck (far more interesting and newsworthy than a timely settlement of the issue), we can be sure that the scenario just outlined will soon sweep Greece off the front financial pages, and trigger the markets’ usual “discounting mechanism”

 

Filed under: Uncategorized

Mideast

Terry Connelly is dean of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

Obama’s was not a Mideast policy speech of a President focused on the short-term — not even his own re-election — but rather on the long term.
He had no realistic hope for a jump-reset of the Israeli-Palestinian peace talk: both sides are stuck in intransigence; Hamas can’t give up its existential threat to israel — for domestic political reasons –  and for similar reasons Netaneyhu (spelling)  cannot give up the ”settlements process”. Thus Obama in effect bypassed the current situation in favor of repositioning US policy more favorably towards those he believes are on the side of history — the Arab street protesters  in particular. One day, it would seem, he believes they will in some fashion (democratic or otherwise)  control the oil the US will remain dependent upon long after Obama is through his second term (ant the speech was very much that of  president who expects a second term).
He has signaled to Bibi’s successor (for all practical purposes the Israeli PM’s unwillingness to “swap” land for peace makes him irrelevant in terms of any peace deal in the near future) that the US may tilt more to its own self-interest rather than categoric support for Israeli bargaining positions. Hence the reference to 1967 borders — a coded way of raising the settlements issue and Jerusalem without saying either word.
Things are in an unprecedented jumble in the Mideast just now, and US interests cannot be set forth in simple, black and white terms reflecting utter “consistency’ across multiple national borders. The President knows he will be attacked by Republican and some Democratic critics — as well as cable-channel field marshalls – for appearing to “throw Israel under the bus”: of course he is not doing that — just saying he will no longer let Israel drag the US under the bus with them should they choose to remain unwilling to negotiate anything except on their most absolute terms. He will tolerate the criticism because the situation in terms of statesmanship requires nuance, and this is a President who “does nuance”.
Likewise, he has signaled to the Palestinians that Hamas one way or another must eat its words and reform its deeds regarding Israel’s right to exist. Neither side will see him as “evenhanded’ but in the short run it makes no difference. There will be no peace for the foreseeable future, and no intifada either — the important action, as the President also signaled, is going on in Syria, Bahrain, Libya and Yemen  — not to mention Pakistan and Iran. That is where the Mideast  future is being determined (it could have been determined by Israel and Palestine but they just can’t make a deal), along with Egypt and Tunisia. The US must be a player from the sidelines in those arenas by definition — we are no longer arguing for imposition of democracy at the point of our guns. But we will stand ready to recognize those who support  true reform…again, in nuanced degrees, but no longer as the total captive of Israeli domestic politics.
In short, this is a speech of a President becoming more confident of re-election himself, not a ’man in a hurry”  – it is the  first_post-Bin Laden articulation of US Mideast policy, and will be read in all foreign capitals as such.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Currency

Terry Connelly is dean of the Ageno School of Business at Golden Gate University and is frequently quoted on business, financial, and economic issues by Bay Area local, as well as national, news media.

It’s Greek to me! A year ago the financial markets were treated to a series of rumors in the wake of the run on Greek sovereign debt: Greece would leave the Euro; Germany would leave the Euro; the Euro would go to par with the US dollar; the Euro would collapse. NONE OF THIS HAPPENED, but the credibility of catastrophic thinking among gullible traders made selected shorts a ton of money as the Dow flashed and crashed and those who were “smart” enough to play this game from the inside reaped a fortune when the markets turned up again beginning in July.n At bottom, it is apparent that some of those who missed the first quarter stock market rally in 2010 engineered a lower “entry point’ by manipulative rumor-mongering, counting on 24-hour cable to megaphone their artificial doom-and-gloom scenarios because they constituted “stories” that would hold  audience attention, as compared with stories like Germany not leaving Euro, the Euro retaining its value against dollar, or Greece not restructuring its debt — all of which were of course true but of little interest to the news editors or commentators on Bloomberg or CNBC.

So, as this movie starts its rerun this May with the Friday article in Spiegel Online, just remember as you hold on to your market wallets — we’ve seen this movie before!

Filed under: Uncategorized, , ,

The Dean’s Annual Thanksgiving Song

THE TSA BLUES:  SUNG TO THE TUNE OF “SMOKE GET’S IN YOUR EYES”.

They said that if I flew

I just must go through….

A body scan machine:

Everything is seen;

You know what I mean!

I said I’d rather not,

My body’s not so hot….

They said we’re not phased

If you skip  X-rays,

We have other ways!

With gloved hands extended

Body parts they rended,

Up and down;

But despite disrobing

And the probing,

Nothing much was found!

So,  common sense aside,

Nothing’s left to hide….

If you want to fly

You must realize

Feds will check your thighs.

Filed under: Uncategorized,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.